Continued Professional Development

---

 Our CPD framework is tailored to specific sectors of close protection / executive protection. 

Following globally recognised CPD models, such as the UK CPD Certification Service, International Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET), and regional frameworks. 

• Learning outcomes tied to professional competence in close protection/executive protection.
• Focus on career development and lifelong learning.
• Industry-specific compliance.

Close Protection Continued Professional Development framework outlines the professional standards, skills and ongoing training required for close protection/executive protection professionals to maintain competency and adapt to evolving threats.

• Policies and procedures that govern our training.
• Ensuring compliance with local laws related to business, education, and certification.
• Develop a business plan outlining our mission, objectives, and target markets.

• Content Relevance: Ensure the CPD programs directly apply to the professional roles of close protection/executive protection.
• Learning Outcomes: Define how our programs improve skills, knowledge, or professional behaviour.
• Delivery Format: Specify acceptable formats (e.g., in-person, online, hybrid) and expectations for each.
• Trainer Credentials: Require evidence of trainer qualifications and expertise in the subject matter (close protection/executive protection).
• Feedback Mechanisms: Include learner evaluations as part of the assessment process.
• Assign assessors to review program content, methodology, and delivery mechanisms.

• Specialists in education, training design, and quality assurance with expertise in the subject matter (close protection/executive protection).
• Include industry professionals as consultants or assessors to ensure credibility in specialised fields.
• Create internal training to ensure consistency in how standards are applied and evaluations conducted.

• Eligibility requirements.
• Application process and timeline.
• Evaluation criteria.
• Rights and responsibilities.

• Define processes for ongoing audits of accredited programs.
• Establish consequences for non-compliance.

• Collect feedback from through surveys and focus groups.
• Use feedback to refine your standards and processes.
• Stay informed about changes in CPD practices, industry trends, and regulatory requirements.
• Regularly update criteria to maintain relevance and credibility..

Internal Quality Assurance (IQA) for close protection training ensures that training programs meet regulatory standards, are effective in delivering essential skills, and maintain consistency. Here’s a detailed overview of implementing an IQA system for close protection training:

Key Objectives

1. Compliance: Adhere to legal and accreditation requirements (e.g., SIA in the UK, or relevant national standards).
2. Consistency: Ensure uniformity in training delivery and assessment across trainers and locations.
3. Continuous Improvement: Identify areas for enhancement to keep training relevant to evolving threats and techniques.

Core Components of IQA for Close Protection Training

Internal Policies and Procedure

• Develop a quality assurance policy specific to close protection training.
• Outline clear processes for assessment, trainer qualifications, and moderation.

Trainer Qualifications

• Ensure trainers meet industry standards (e.g., certified close protection operatives with real-world experience).
• Conduct regular CPD (Continuous Professional Development) sessions.
• Monitor and evaluate trainers' performance through observations.

Curriculum Standards

• Align training modules with industry best practices, such as: 
  • Risk assessment and management.
  • Route planning and embus/debus techniques.
  • Conflict management and de-escalation.
  • Emergency response, including medical care and IED protocols.
• Regularly review and update course content to reflect emerging trends in security threats.

Assessment and Evaluation

• Standardised Assessment Tools: Develop written, practical, and scenario-based evaluations.
• Objective Grading Criteria: Use rubrics to ensure fairness and transparency.
• Verification: Cross-check assessment results with secondary evaluators.

Observation and Moderation

• Conduct regular observations of training sessions.
• Sample assessments to ensure consistency and accuracy in grading.
• Identify any biases or discrepancies among trainers.

Learner Feedback

• Collect structured feedback from trainees to gauge satisfaction and areas for improvement.
• Address concerns promptly and use feedback to refine the training process.

Record Keepng

• Maintain detailed records of: 
  • Trainer qualifications and CPD.
  • Learner progress and certification.
  • Observations, audits, and feedback.

Key Metrics for Monitoring Quality

• Pass rates and post-training employment rates.
• Incident reports during simulations or real-world assignments.
• Feedback from principals or organisations employing trained operatives.

Continuous Improvement Strategies

• Regularly review intelligence on new threats and tactics to update the curriculum.
• Incorporate technological advancements (e.g., drones, cybersecurity protocols).
• Encourage trainers and learners to attend workshops and industry conferences.